|
"It
is not that Christianity has been tried and
found wanting, but that it has been found hard
and not tried."
G.K.
Chesterton
|
|
|
|
The Book |
|
|
Destroying Our
Private Cities
For W'nT visitors @
Christmas-tyme
Two books for $7.00--One for $4.50
(plus shipping)
see below>> |
|
|
|
Wn'T Home |
|
Book Home |
Author
Profile |
Endorsements |
Samples |
Other
writing |
|
|
 |
Sample Exposition
Destroying Our Private Cities,
Building Our Spiritual Life |
|
Click here for
free
sample chapter,
Putting Jesus Back into Our Potential |
| |
|
From Chapter One,
Destroying Our Private Cities (
1:1‑2)
MY girl friend from college was staying
with her sister and brother‑in‑law for
the weekend. She was on an
assignment for her course in child
psychology. Her project: Observe
how little children interpret the world
around them.
One of the observations was unplanned.
Her four‑year‑old nephew, Ben,
unashamedly opened the bathroom door and
entered, to the surprise of his aunt.
Although a bit startled, his aunt was
able to use the occasion to help Ben
understand the concept of privacy.
“Ben, when people close the door,
that means they would like to have their
privacy.” Ben acknowledged his
aunt’s instruction and went his way.
The issue seemed to be settled.
Later that afternoon, Ben's mother
noticed his bedroom door closed.
That was a bit unusual, she thought.
She proceeded to open it to check on her
son.
“Ben, are you all right?” she asked
in a tone of concern.
Ben looked up and in a
matter‑of‑fact voice said, “Mom, I
closed my door because I want my own
private city.”
That serendipity is as instructive
as it is winsome. It is both
appropriate and polite to respect
another's privacy. But there comes
a time in a culture when the concept of
privacy can hinder the equally
appropriate sense of community. It
can stifle cooperative participation in
the responsibilities of the community.
Attitudes such as my world, my choice
eventually produce the pursuit of
personal fulfillment. Like
young Ben, people today seem to crave
their own private city.
|
From Chapter 7,
Sanctification Is a Community Event (
2:12‑18)
After steering the Philippian believers
back to their original call—their first
love—Paul says to them, “Work out your
salvation with fear and trembling.”
Sometimes we need to hear the actual
Greek word order. Say it aloud:
“With fear and trembling, your
salvation, work it out.” Paul
puts the verb last for emphasis.
It is a serious matter our salvation to
work out. We often simply respond
to this text by adding, “Work out what
God has worked in.” We should note
two things, however. One, this
text is addressed to the whole
congregation. The “you” is plural.
That prompts the other points or
questions: What is being worked in and
how does the congregation work it out?
The phrase “fear and trembling”
can have a wide range of
connotations: fear of failure, nervous
anxiety about one's responsibilities,
awe and reverence in the presence of
someone or something. Which best
fits the context?
When fear and trembling are
juxtaposed in this manner, they can
suggest something positive rather than
something negative. Only Paul,
among New Testament writers, joins the
two words. Nowhere does he use
them to indicate an attitude we should
have before God—that is, fearing and
trembling before God. Invariably
he uses them to indicate the disposition
people should have toward each other (1
Corinthians 2:3; 2 Corinthians 7:15;
Ephesians 6:5). Were we to give
this idiomatic phrase a contemporary
twist, it would be something like, “Have
respect for each other.” In the
broader context, Philippians 2:12 calls
us to renew our obedience to Christ by
showing mutual respect within our local
church.
|
From Chapter 9,
Discerning Between Christ and Rubbish
( 3:1‑11)
Paul has been relatively calm, like a
mother caring for her child or a nurse
tending an invalid. Now, in 3:2,
exhortation makes way for warning. The
NIV expresses the warning but once:
“Watch out.” Actually, Paul says it
three times: “Watch out for those dogs,
watch out for those men who do evil,
watch out for those mutilators of the
flesh” (3:2, free translation). The
warning is harsh. Paul's tone is
harsh. His words are calculated and
biting.
The father of the Philippian church
chooses words that have even a harsh
sound. He wants to gain their attention
quickly. His words describing the false
teachers and the agitators have the
rough k sound: kunas
(dogs); kakous ergatas (evil
workers), katatomen
(mutilators). In each case he inverts a
Jewish boast. Dogs refers to
those outside the covenant (Matthew 7:6;
15:26‑27). It was a dirty slang word
used by Jews for Gentiles. Evil
workers was a play on a common
Jewish and Christian term for
missionary. Thus reversing a positive
title to indicate that those who had
come into their midst were actually
workers of evil rather than faithful
bearers of the gospel (2 Corinthians
11:13; also see 1 Corinthians 3:13‑15;
9:6; 1 Timothy 5:18; 2 Timothy 2:15 and
Matthew 9:38).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wn'T Home |
|
Book Home |
Author
Profile |
Endorsements |
Samples |
Other
writing |
|
|
|
|
"My conscience
is captive to the Word of God."
|
|
|